Official medicine
considers health as being the absence of disease and, in this perspective,
created "preventive medicine", this concept allows all kinds of drifts:
by driving away diseases, one is assured of good health. Alas, this postulate
is false and thus vaccination induces a
race without end: to avoid diseases that
are proper to childhood, we inject all kinds of vaccines which prevent
the immune system to develop naturally. Then, because these diseases develop
later, booster shots are multiplied. When new diseases emerge, research
is rushed to find a new vaccine. The absurd and destructive process of
vaccine reflex, just amplifies problems and deteriorates health ...
CULTURAL
DEPENDENCES
.
Dr Albert Schweitzer (Nobel 1952) had noticed
that the first cancers in Africa appeared 5 years after the first vaccination
campaign. Numerous studies show that countries
with the lowest vaccination rates are the ones that have the healthiest
population.
None is able to say what will be the diseases
of the future generations of largely vaccinated population, but the
risk of seeing serious pathologies, which will only get worst with time,
emerge is large. AIDS could be one of
those…
Yet, unconscious of these problems, the consumer
became dependant and manufacturers have no problem to maintain this dependence,
because the vaccine, well reflects today’s conception of diseases, the
doctor’s role and the community’s responsibility for health: the
vaccine prevents from taking responsibilities, from getting involved...
Considering that we live in symbiosis with the
microbes is primordial. Microbes
are no more pathogenic than any other beings.
Microorganisms are mainly endogenous and are compounds of vital elements
that are more elaborate. Their function is to participate to the upholding
of life. Already, in 1883, John Shaw Billings, eminent specialist of public
health, had declared:
"It is important to notice
that the simple introduction of microbes in a living organism does not
always cause their multiplication and the disease. The result is
very influenced by the state of the organism."
BALANCE
BETWEEN IMMUNE SYSTEM AND NATURAL VIRUSES
.
Mankind progressively acquired and consolidated
its immunity, instituting a balance between the viruses of childhood diseases
and the environment and it is not possible to predict in the long run what
this rupture of balance by vaccination
may cause.
Also, the immunity brought by the disease is final,
that is not the case for the protection induced by vaccination, if protection
there is, -the levels of antibodies measured after vaccination are usually
lower to the ones measured after the diseases: the protection is limited.
As soon as 1984, Prof. Richard DeLong, virologist and immunologist at the
University of Toledo (Texas), wrote in "A Possible cause of AIDS and
other new diseases", which treated of the origins of AIDS and other
new diseases:
"Everything leads us to
believe that a dependable balance exists between
the human immunological system and natural viruses. Breaking this balance
could have unforeseeable consequences." (From
Med. Hypotheses, vol 395 n°13 – 1984).
Prof. DeLong particularly studied the live
vaccines. In "Live viral vaccine, biological, pollution" published
in 1996, he worries: "Did logic and reason abandoned epidemiologists?"
Alarmed
with the idea that live virus vaccines can generate new diseases as well
as malformations, chromosomal aberrations, mutations and cancers, he adds:
"The
voluntary and unnecessary introduction of infectious viruses in a human
body is an insane act which can only be directed by a large ignorance of
virology and of the infectious processes.
[…] The evil done is incalculable."
As immunologist, he believes that live viruses can
regain their virulence and favor the rupture of balance in ecological and
epidemiological domains. He finds inconceivable that most of vaccines promoters
ignore what virologists already discovered and that they continue, without
scruples, to infect human beings with live viruses in the name of immunology.
ANTIBODIES:
ONLY THE MARK OF AGRESSION
On February 19, 1985, the medical magazine "Le
Généraliste" was already warning:
"A virus, even attenuated,
can regain its virulence – it is notably the case of the vaccinal polio
virus, which regains its pathogeneity after going through the intestine
canal and contributes to contaminate the surrounding. Cases of polio within
contacts of the vaccinated ones by the oral vaccine are well known."
Indeed, it was often noticed that certain
diseases declares within patients who just received a vaccination against
this very same disease they were trying to get protected from. If
some just want to see unfortunate coincidences, others believes that there
is a relation of cause and effect due to the danger represented by the
inoculation of microbes or toxins in a healthy organism which becomes less
resistant due to the "stress" induced by vaccination.
Antibodies are only the mark of aggression, like
the bruise is the result of being kicked, or simply the sign of infection,
like the red light indicates that the bathrooms are occupied. The vaccines
like the antibiotics are only diminishing the vitality of the medium, which
diminishes the natural resistance and the medium alteration becomes a source
of cancer. And when one considers
that a vaccinated child does not develop such or such disease and that
he is immunized, the reality is very different: he does not have the strength
to react anymore. Chronic diseases settle in the ones with a very low level
of vitality, energy. They don’t have violent reactions because their organism
is sapped from inside.
REGAIN OF
PATHOLOGIES
.
Already, on January 24th, 1974, in
the Concours Médical, Prof. Pariente warned: "It
might not be without danger that we stimulate immunity either through tissues
or with a syringe." And in 1979, in
"The
dangers of immunization", Doctors Kalokerinos and Dettmann, from the
Biological Research Institute of Australia, were asserting:
"According to sophisticated
research the effects produced by the childhood vaccination programs on
T lymphocytes […] show that the immune system turns out to be substantially
damaged after routine vaccinations. An important part of the T lymphocytes
are mobilized by specific antigens found in the vaccines. Once thus mobilized,
these T lymphocytes become immunologically inert, incapable of reacting
or defending themselves against other antigens, infections or diseases.
These discoveries aim to show that the immunological
capital is being substantially weakened within the many children subjected
to standard vaccination programs."
More recently, in a file dedicated to Pasteur,
the "Journal du CNRS"[CNRS is the National center for scientific research]
of April 1995 (n°64) wonders:
"What to say, today, about
the hopes of vaccination programs? The time
at which this was considered as the universal solution to all infectious
diseases is bygone. In front of the question
of AIDS, of hepatitis C and of malaria, a realization of limits and difficulties
of the method appeared. The essential problem is the variability, which
allows the pathogenic agent to escape the host’s immune response and to
establish a persistent infection."
In his work Immunologie Fondamentale et appliquée
[Fundamental and applied Immunology], Prof. Roitt declares:
"The results about acute
viral infections must be interpreted with precautions. Although it is possible
in vitro to destroy viruses or infected cells, it is difficult to evaluate
the importance of those mechanisms in vivo. […] This problem is crucial
for the vaccination process. Since we don’t know the working functions
constituting the normal protection mechanism against viral infections for
the human body, the production of vaccines remains empiric. The
danger of activating inappropriate working functions always exists, causing
more severe diseases and an immuno-pathologic state."
Therefore, we
pretend eradicating diseases when we make new ones emerge, which are well
worst, by refusing – by ignorance of the mechanism of the living- to recognize
the harmful consequences of displacing the medium.
Therefore, is it so astonishing to assist to a regain of pathologies we
thought halted and which are resurging with more aggressiveness? This phenomenon
concerning microbes could be compared to the systematic use of insecticides,
which gave birth to more venomous or more harmful insects and the weed-killers
that made the plant more resistant.
COMPOSITION
OF VACCINES
The large public and even many doctors ignore
what is in the syringe. For the classic fabrication, first a viral or bacterial
antigen is used, it is a germ (virus or bacteria) either killed or alive
but attenuated. Although they are attenuated or killed, vaccines are neither
"dead" nor "neutral" since they should keep their immunizing power, that
is having the power of making the immune system react. Their active constituent
is therefore capable of making sick. The
more a medicine is active, the higher is the risk of presenting undesirable
effects. Officially, vaccines renowned for being very efficient
are declared with no serious side effects.
How can we believe such an absurdity? To fabricate viral vaccines, cell
cultures are needed because a virus is not independent and therefore can
only live inside a cell. Elements taken from animals
or fetuses are very often used for these
cultures. Now, the WHO (World Health Organization) was warning against
the use of cell substrate for the fabrication of vaccines, which
can be contaminated by unknown viruses such
as the SV40 responsible for cancers, through contaminating DNA or through
transforming proteins.
ALUMINIUM,
MERCURY AND "GULF WAR SYNDROME"
..
Although it is forbidden by the legislation
taking care of injectable drugs because of the contamination risk by prions,
calf serum is used to increase cell cultures.
Why vaccines can escape these interdictions?
To make vaccines more active, an adjuvant of immunity
is used, aluminum hydroxide the most often. The
toxicity of aluminum is known for long, yet it did not affect the vaccination
policy or its use for the fabrication of vaccines.
Prof. Gherardi, from the Henri Mondor Hospital,
informed the parliamentary mission for information on the "gulf war syndrome",
that the syndrome, which presents strong analogies with macrophagic myofasciitis,
could be linked to some vaccines systematically injected to military personnel
(hepatitis A, B, tetanus…). It was even demonstrated later on that the
crystalline inclusions in macrophages were aluminum crystals (see Gherardi&all.
"Macrophagic
myofasciitis: a reaction to intramuscular injections of aluminium containing
containing vaccines", in Journal of Neurology
n°246, 1999).
Finally, most of the vaccines also contain stabilizers
and excipients, potentially dangerous toxic products and preservatives
based with mercury, sodium mercurothiolate
or Thiomersal derivated from mercury, which is toxic for the brain and
the kidneys. A recent American study underscored
a connection between Thiomersal containing vaccines and the neurological
or renal attacks in nurslings.
MANIPULATION
OF THE LIVING
.
Concerning the vaccines produced by genetic engineering,
instead of using viruses or bacteria, certain segments of their chromosomes
are isolated then they are grafted on others to obtain hybrid elements,
naturally non-existent. It is therefore a manipulation of the living.
Thus, a vaccine
against hepatitis B inoculates substances eventually cancerous and tools
residues from genetic manipulation that could be at the origin of cases
of teratogenesis. The report 747 from
1986 from the WHO, indicated that, in the final product, could be found
proteins capable of metastasizing other cells, and especially DNA from
cultured cells, and the risk of malignancy represented in the long run
by a contaminating heterogeneous DNA, particularly if it turns out that
it contains coding or regulating sequences, potentially oncogene. In the
case of the GenHevac B vaccine, the matter is the genome fragment of two
viruses, the SV40, monkey virus and the MMTV, the mouse mammary tumor virus.
A more disturbing detail: this vaccine may also
contain some kind of enzyme, the TdT (Terminal Desoxynucleotidyl Transferase),
found in different normal and pathological cells. This enzyme is also found
in the retroviruses, those are viruses with a RNA genome, and susceptible
of inducing undesirable nucleotidic sequences in receptive DNA cells, and
capable of modifying genes thus considerably multiplying genetic diseases
and other chromosomal aberrations within the vaccinated population and
their descendants.
CANCEROUS
EFFECTS
.
The mutagenic potential of this enzyme was demonstrated
during in vitro trials when synthesizing DNA. But it may
take several decades for the mutagenic effects of DNA fragments to declare
a cancerous pathology. Like in the past,
one will be able to hear the officials saying: "In the state of what was
known at that time, no one could have known what was going to happen".
No one "could" or did not "want"?
Today, we are used to discover, several decades
after being marketed that some vaccines were dangerous, such as the TAB
and DT-TAB vaccines, for which we learned, 50 years later, that they were
not only inefficient but especially that they were not innocuous, just
like 45 years were needed to officially admit that the vaccine against
the yellow fever introduced the hepatitis B virus to the vaccinated people!
Concerning the Salk vaccine against poliomyelitis,
it was given for more than 9 years to 600 million people before it was
indicated that it was contaminated with the SV40 from the monkey, which
is found in many cancers.
According to Harris Coulter, eminent American
specialist from the history of vaccinations, in his book "Vaccination,
social violence and criminality", any vaccination is susceptible of
causing a light or serious encephalitis. This phenomenon is going along
with a demyelisation, which prevent the normal development of the myelin
sheath in the brain. These pathologic modifications are leading to diverse
handicaps and behavior problems.
EPIDEMICS
AND VACCINES: THE EXAMPLE OF PLAGUE
.
Wrongly; one is asked to believe that most of
the epidemics disappeared thanks to vaccinations. Yet, plague
raged for centuries throughout the world and disappeared completely without
any vaccination program.
Although there is no vaccine against this disease,
large plague epidemics don’t rage anymore. In a general way, the recession
of diseases always started before the introduction of vaccines. Moreover,
if
the disappearance of epidemics was essentially due to vaccinations, these
diseases should still rage in the countries where vaccinations are not
practiced or abandoned, while the history of epidemiology demonstrates
completely the contrary and besides that
the international scientific press testifies that epidemics still break
out where the vaccination cover is almost complete.
Since 1949, when the British citizens had their
vaccination obligation lifted, the United
Kingdom brilliantly demonstrated that suppressing vaccination obligation
did not bring any kind of resurgence of epidemics,
argument always used by the ones in favor of vaccinations to continue to
impose vaccinations. Eastern countries practiced for almost 50 years systematic
vaccination, therefore covering the almost totality of their population.
Still, it is in those countries that one can see the resurgence of diphtheria
and poliomyelitis. It is therefore legitimate to think that on one side
this vaccine was not as efficient as pretended and on the other side, it
generated bacteriological modifications directly linked to the vaccine
strain.
Noticing the inefficiency of some vaccines
is so patent that the laboratories themselves sometimes establish it.
Thus SmithKline Beecham, manufacturer of the hepatitis B vaccine, declared:
"The vaccination against
HBV, mandatory for some people at risk, would be worth to be extended to
a larger population, notably the younger ones, the vaccination of higher
risk people seems to have no impact, in the United States, on the incidence
of the disease." (See Le concours médical, vol. 15, n°4, 1993).
Acknowledgement of inefficiency stated by the manufacturing
laboratory, which still recommends expanding a vaccination program that
has no impact on the disease!
VACCINES
WORSEN AIDS EVOLUTION
.
IOver 30 years ago,
in "Tendance de la médecine contemporaine", Prof. Deloge
was warning that:
"If we continue to generalize
and multiply the use of vaccines, it can be conceived that in few decades,
a new pathology, the one of vaccinated societies, will appear".
It is not excluded that this new pathology could
very well be AIDS,
unknown when he wrote his work. The Quotidien du Médecin of May
9th 1996 state an American study which:
"…Shows that an antigenic
stimulation, in this case the anti-tetanus vaccine booster, increases transitorily
the expression of the HIV within infected people and make non-infected
people more susceptible to the virus. It was showed that the replication
of the HIV virus is increased after the prophylactic administration of
flu vaccine or the vaccine of hepatitis B to HIV infected patients…"
A team directed by Dr Stanley and composed with Dr
Anthony Fauci, demonstrated that in vitro vaccination process also seem
to increase the susceptibility towards infection of the peripheral
lymphocytes of non-infected people.
"After vaccination, plasmatic
viremia was multiplied by a factor of 2 to 36 (in 13 patients), then decreased
down to its initial value in 6 weeks, and the proviral charge (the number
of infected cells) was moderately increased in the blood (11 out of 13
patients) or the ganglia (2 out of 2). Moreover, the virus was more easily
isolated from the lymphocytes after vaccination than before."
These publications shed light on the aggravating
role of vaccination in the evolution of AIDS and their triggering role
of the HIV infection in healthy people.
They confirm the studies already done in Vienna, which demonstrated that
the anti-tetanus vaccine would generate a pre-AIDS situation, as noticed
in the New England Journal of Medicine n°3 of 1981 (vol.3 10).
The Austrian research team could notice that between the 3rd
and the 14th day after vaccination, there was a significant
decrease in the proportion of lymphocytes OKT 4 and OKT 8, in other words
a sizeable weakening of the immune defense of vaccinated patients. The
vaccination had set the organism in its lowest resistance state.
Yet before 1981, no one had ever heard about AIDS.
But let us remember that for many years the live virus of vaccinia, with
its complete genetic capital, was introduced in the organisms and that
the African populations were the most vaccinated against smallpox without
ever sequencing the genome of the vaccinia virus. This observation lead
Dr Louis de Brouwer to bring up a hypothesis associated with this policy:
"… What if, by the vaccination
principle, by introducing the genetic capital of the vaccinia virus (live
virus not attenuated) in an organism, we were allowing the HIV-2, found
in Africans, to reconstitute all or part of its genetic capital that had
become deficient and, consequently, to make it recover its virulence or
to create a new virus unknown until now, such as the AIDS virus? […] We
call that a genetic recombination and experiments showing it is possible
were realized."(see Sida: Le vertige 1997).
In order to verify his hypothesis, Dr Louis de Brouwer
asked the WHO to give him the complete list of any vaccination made in
Africa for the last 20 years. He could therefore notice that the
map of vaccinations against variola and the map of AIDS cases could be
exactly superposed.
"The relation between the
vaccination program of the WHO in an effort to eradicate smallpox from
the third-world countries and the epidemics of AIDS is an interesting hypothesis.
I am not saying that it really happened, but for many years, I always said
that the use of live virus vaccines, such
as practiced in Africa, can activate a sleeping virus such as the one of
AIDS." Prof.
Robert Gallo (Times, 5/11/87)
"Now, I am convinced that
the theory calling into question the vaccination against variola well explains
the expansion of AIDS. […] The theory connecting AIDS and the vaccination
against smallpox explains the case of each of the 7 countries of central
Africa having the highest rate of AIDS. […] The
highest rates of AIDS coincide with the most intense vaccination campaigns".
(a counselor for the WHO, Times, 5/11/87
FANTASTIC
WORK
.
All these drifting and the reigning omerta on
vaccination accidents are caused by the undeniable weight of the vaccine
market in the world economy. Evaluated at $2¼ billions in 1995,
including $750 millions in Europe, it should reach the mark of the $6¼
billions by 2005. (See L’Expension n°555 – 8/28/97). Third source
of income for the SmithKline Beecham group; after the antibiotics and the
nervous system drugs, vaccines represent 16% of the group’s turnover and
was suppose to reach 20% in 2001. As announced by the "Panorama du médecin"
of 10/20/94, a subsidiary of Pasteur-Mérieux-MDS, with a $50 million
capital, was created in order to develop in Europe the totality of the
vaccines of the parent company and to enlarge their sphere of activity.
For
the governments, it is difficult to oppose the laboratories that are richer
than the states themselves, for the vaccines as well as for the drugs.
Thus they are making themselves be a party of the omnipotent pharmaceutical
lobbies.
Now, a witch-hunt is raging towards the ones who
have the temerity to criticize the vaccination dogma and the darkness covering
it. The Minister of Health, the experts, the administration, and then the
Conseil de l’Ordre immediately and unanimously accuse these scientists,
yet of high level, to belong to a sect. Thus, researchers who dare to denounce
the serious drifts and the dangers of the system need lots of rigueur,
bravery, conviction and abnegation…
inspired
by Sylvie Simon in UNIVERS SPIRALE n,°26 Hiver 2001 p 39 à 45
(in french)
|
]